The publication of manuscripts in this journal aims to establish a robust and reputable knowledge network. Each manuscript serves as a testament to the author’s expertise and the institution’s support. The peer-review process for manuscripts submitted to this journal is conducted in accordance with scientific principles. Consequently, it is imperative for all stakeholders involved in the publication process, including publishers, managers, editors, reviewers, and authors, to adhere to this code of conduct.

 

Author Responsibility:

• Authors are required to present accurate, original, and honest research reports without data manipulation.
• Manuscripts must be complete and properly reference sources to be accountable.
• The submitted manuscript must be original work and not currently submitted to any other journal without approval.
• Authors should appropriately acknowledge all sources of data and related work.
• The contribution of each author should be clearly described, only those who contribute significantly should be authors.
• Authors must disclose any conflicts of interest.
• If errors are found in the published manuscript, the author must immediately inform the editor.
• Authors must state if the research involves hazardous materials or human/animal subjects.

 

Responsibilities of Editor:

• Publication Decisions: The editor is responsible for making publication decisions based on peer review recommendations, considering the validity and relevance of the research.
• Peer Review Process: The editor ensures that the peer review process is fair, confidential, and independent, and that conflicts of interest are avoided.
• Confidentiality: The editor guarantees the confidentiality of manuscripts and author-related information.
• Unpublished Material: Editors are prohibited from using unpublished material without the author’s consent.

 

Responsibilities of Reviewers:

 

• Confidentiality: Reviewers are obligated to maintain the confidentiality of manuscripts and author information.
• Reference Completeness: Reviewers are responsible for ensuring the completeness of references and identifying potential instances of plagiarism or conflicts of interest.
• Objectivity and Constructiveness: Reviewers are expected to provide reviews that are objective, constructive, and adhere to the journal’s guidelines.
• Ethical Violations Reporting: Reviewers are required to report suspected ethical violations to the editor without conducting their own investigation.